From Law wiki, the wiki for law research

[1987] 2 EGLR 173 (ChD). The claimants sought an injunction to prohibit the defendants' allowing the booms of their cranes to swing over their (the claimants) property. There was no question that damage had been caused, or was likely to be caused, but as a matter of principle the infrigement was a trespass, and should be curtailed. The court accepted this argument, on the authorities, albeit with some reluctance.