Aratra Potato v Taylor Joynson Garrett (1995)
Created by Chief Lawiki on 9 October 2009, at 16:27
|
Aratra Potato v Taylor Joynson Garrett (1995) Created by Chief Lawiki on 9 October 2009, at 16:27
From Law wiki, the wiki for law research[1995] 4 All E.R. 695; (1995) 145 N.L.J. 1402. A firm of solicitors, TJG, offered a 20 percent reduction in fees if it lost a case. Their clients accepted this arragnement but decided during the litigation to change solicitors. The client sought to recover the retainer already paid, while the solicitors sought payment of outstanding fees of nearly a quarter million pounds. The judge (Garland J) held that the contract was unenforceable for Champerty, so neither party could recover on it.Contributors This page was last modified on 23 December 2011, at 07:02.This page has been accessed 1,287 times.
|
||