Last visited:
Chapelton v Barry Urban District Council (1940)
Created by mike on 21 October 2009, at 16:17



From Law wiki, the wiki for law research

Jump to: navigation, search
Chapelton v Barry UDC
180px
Court Court of Appeal
Citation(s) [1940] 1 KB 532
Judge(s) sitting Slesser LJ, Mackinnon LJ and Goddard LJ

This case (Chapelton v Barry Urban District Council [1940] 1 KB 532) demonstrates the distinction between a Contract and a receipt for the purposes of incorporation of an Exclusion clause.

Mr Chapelton and his girlfried hire deck-chairs for the beach at Barry, at a cost of tuppence (two imperial pence). The deck-chair attendant gave Mr Chapelton a piece of paper in receipt. On the paper was a term disclaiming liability for personal injury. Mr Chapelton's deck-chair collapsed, injuring his back; he made a claim for damages against the District Council. The latter drew attention to disclaimer. The court held that the paper issued to Chapelton was merely a receipt, not a contract. In this case, it was stressed, nobody could be expected to enter into legal relations on the strength of 2p. Actually, this isn't strictly true (see: Consideration), but it did allow the court to strike down an unfair exclusion clause. These days, of course, such a course of action would be unnecessary; the Unfair contract terms act (1977) disallows clauses that disclaim responsibility for personal injury arising out of negligence.
Ukflag.png

Contributors

Chief Lawiki, Moha, mike

This page was last modified on 23 December 2011, at 07:06.This page has been accessed 3,531 times.