Last visited:
Created by 121.1.18.242 on 29 December 2009, at 07:59
legal social network



From Law wiki, the wiki for law research

Jump to: navigation, search

'One can't give what one doesn't have' (see: Title). This is the principle that a person can't give a better title to goods than that which he holds himself. There are four well-known exceptions to this principle.

  • If person A hands over goods to person B to sell on A's behalf, and if B sells to C, then C obtains A's title, not B's. This means that A could not enforce damages against C, nor force the goods to be returned, if B did not pay him. This allows people to from agents (e.g., car dealers) without worrying that the previous owner will attempt to reclaim if the agent defaults on payment.
  • Similarly, if A hands goods to B in the expectation of payment, and B then sells to C, C obtains A's title, not B's. This allows people to buy from, say, a retailer without worrying that the retailer's supplier would be able to reclaim if the retailer defaulted on payment. Otherwise the whole business of trade would falter.
  • If A contracts to sell to B, but B does not claim the goods, and A sells them again to C, then C obtains A's title. The principle here is that if one arranges to buy goods, and doesn't claim them, one can't complain if the seller sells to someone else instead.
  • A person who buys in 'Market overt' always obtains good title, even if the seller's title is worthless.
Land Law article

Contributors

Chief Lawiki

This page was last modified on 24 May 2011, at 14:46.This page has been accessed 3,444 times.