RichardsonVLRCProducts2000
Created by 121.1.18.237 on 3 November 2009, at 11:17
From Law wiki, the wiki for law research
[2000] PIQR P164 (QB). The claimant became pregnant after a condom manufactured by the defendant failed in use. She claimed damages for personal injury under the consumer protection act (1987). Her claim failed because it was not reasonable to expect that a condom would never fail. There was thus no 'defect' for the purposes of the Act.
-- Main.KevinBoone - 15 Jan 2004

